North Korea qualification to spice up the World Cup

By Tom Mallows:

So they have done it, no not tested nuclear weapons (though they have done that as well but that’s not what I’m talking about), North Korea have qualified for their first World Cup since 1966.

Ironically that tournament was probably the last time the country was seen in a positive light by much of the Western world. They were plucky underdogs who came away with a shock 1-0 win over Italy at Middlesbrough’s Ayresome Park before surging into a 3-0 half time lead over Eusebio’s Portugal at Goodison Park, only to collapse in the second and lose 5-3.

But since then it has been tales of domestic oppression, nuclear weapons and one of George Bush’s famous ‘axis of evil’.

Unfortunately football and politics don’t really mix, and as much as the North Korean side will look to concentrate on their football at the tournament in South Africa next year, the political undertones from both sides will always bubble to the surface – can you imagine if the USA are drawn in their group? Football betting on that one would be interesting!

The qualification has all the hallmarks of one achieved through the influence of a dictator. They train like a military platoon, running themselves into the ground. Because of that they will become one of the fittest teams at the tournament with a high stamina rate, constantly hustling and harrying away at the opposition. This sort of high tempo game is usually only effective for certain parts of games before you become worn out. However the military training has allowed the team to play this type of game for the full 90, and it has reaped dividends.

What has SA soccer achieved?

From the Sports Mongrel blog

I don't mean to be an ultra-SA-pessimist but the question has to be asked - what exactly has South African soccer achieved in the last 5 years?

This was the question going through my mind after the 0-0 draw with Iraq on Sunday evening.

Sponsors have poured an absolute bucket-load into player development, coaches, improving league standards etc and all the while the average ranking of South Africa in global terms has gone down. If I remember correctly we are now ranked 72nd in the world.

That is disappointing considering that in terms of rand invested per player, we must be one of the highest on the continent.

The African countries ranked above us at this moment in time according to the Fifa rankings at the start of June are:

• Cameroon (21)
• Nigeria (30)
• Ghana (36)
• Ivory Coast (38)
• Egypt (40)
• Gabon (48)
• Burkina Faso (50)
• Tunisia (51)
• Guinea (53)
• Mali (54)
• Morocco (55)
• Gambia (65)
• Algeria (66)
• Uganda (67)
• Togo (68)
• Libya (69)

If I understand the rankings correctly then we need to bear in mind that apart from Nigeria and Cameroon, we've played far tougher opposition than many of these other teams so our rankings might suffer a bit.

Can I pinpoint why we don't succeed? Nope.

We have money, we have players, we have (in many cases) world class administrators who have put us in front of the world with match-ups against the worlds best.

Is it our coaches? Aaaahh now this is a question that begs to be asked. Phillipe Troussier and Carlos Alberto Parreira are some of the biggest names in world football. Joel Santana was hand-picked by Parreira (who one must assumes knows what he was doing).

Go back in history and see who SA's most successful coaches were - Clive Barker and Jomo Sono - two South African guys with limited international know-how but an ability to gel with their local players.

Personally I think it could be a more fundamental problem - South African football has no real strategy. We talk a big game with big ambitions but if you zero in on it - we don't really have an overall strategy for SA soccer in terms of where we want to be and no accountability in terms of achieving it.

To me it is mind-boggling that we can't qualify for the African Nations Cup?! But there doesn't seem to have been repercussions for those in charge or being paid to perform on the field. You can rebuild as much as you like, I get the sense that South Africa is simply trying to shoot too high with the wrong resources.

If a decent plan isn't in place then we need to accept that perhaps its better we pour money into BMX or tennis or even lawn-darts rather than overspending on soccer.

Confeds Cup is here

The much awaited Confederations Cup is finally here and South Africa takes on Iraq this afternoon. I've had my say about the low-key marketing build-up and whether the tournament organisers could have done more to promote the event.... now it's down to the soccer.

Did anyone go out of their way to pick up tickets?

You excited about the event? Let me know your thoughts.

International football picks

There is a lot of international football on the go this weekend and we've put R5 down on quite a few of the games. Here are our picks on a straight win / loss basis:

• North Korea to beat Iran
• Burkina Faso to beat Malawi
• South Africa and Poland to draw
• Norway to beat Macedonia
• Republic of Ireland to beat Bulgaria
• Sweden and Denmark to draw
• Austria to beat Serbia
• Brazil to beat Uruguay

Will be interesting to see what Saturday plays out like.

If you can’t beat them, join em?

By Tom Mallows

So the first major transfer of the summer has been completed - in double quick time. I have to admit I thought the Gareth Barry saga would drag out across another close-season, but I suppose when you are offered 100k a week it won’t take you long to make up your mind.

The Barry move is only to be the start of a summer of lavish spending from Man City who have had a wallet full of Arab cash burning a hole in their pocket since last September.

But opinion appears to be divided as to whether what they are doing is good for football. On one hand people would like to see the top four face competition. The same four teams have comfortably shared the same spots in the Premier League table in the past few years to the detriment of the league. Any club who is looking to challenge that exclusive club should be applauded.

Recent financial results have shown the worryingly high level of debt the top four carry and if the Champions League umbilical cord was snatched away from them it would be interesting to see whether they could survive. Some would be happy to see them pay for their irresponsible fiscal policy.

But on the other hand is City’s lavish, some say reckless, spending just adding to the problem? Some of the fees they have spent – or are prepared to spend – are beyond the reaches of many small countries let alone football clubs.

If, for example, City oust Arsenal from that top four spot, hooray! Someone different people will say. But what then? City will just become the another one of the villainous ‘big four’ selfishly hogging the Champions League honey pot and buying whoever they want – another Chelsea in other words. Is that good for the Premier League?

We need to curb this cycle of reckless, obscene spending not add to it before it spirals out of control. The more clubs who gamble with big money the harder they will fall when things go wrong – imagine Leeds and times it by ten.

What happens if owners get bored and decided to call their money in? After all football clubs appear to be the latest fashion accessory at the moment, but don’t forget things go out of fashion.

We need to get back to the old adages of hard work, organisation and good skillful management. Otherwise the so-called ‘best league in the world’ will be decided purely on the size of your wallet, if that is not already the case!